Recently, I had a dream about a leader of WOFF. Why even mention it? Though it was “only a dream”, it helped answer some questions for me. So, I will share it. Others may be helped.

    

     The person in the dream was doubting his course. I felt compassion for him and was encouraging him. He was reflective, not telling me how to think or act or “chewing me like a dog on a bone”. He was not rushing back to the church to find his next Jane Whaley assigned task. We rode in his pick-up truck through a corn field. We pulled over and as I was talking,  he just sat looking dejected.  I was letting him know that by my leaving WOFF, I rejected the message and method he had come to cherish.  As mentioned in a previous post; it is possible to reject the methods, the message and not the members of a religious group.

    

      I knew a little of his personal background. He had moved on from the message of his father’s holiness church in which he grew up. Next he attended a Southern Baptist Church. He had moved on from there.  He moved on from being a support minster for another traveling minister. Eventually, he founded his own ministry. Many of the beginning teachings were reflective of the original “Word of Faith” message of Kenneth Hagin.  He attended conferences for that group at the same time as Jane and Sam. Later, he reconnected with Jane and Sam Whaley (mid 1980’s) with their message of deliverance. This man had moved “forward in God” several times that I was aware of. His journey was not unlike many other WOFF members. Many had come to WOFF through spirtual steps on a journey.  Could he be considering he next move? Was there a struggle raging inside of him? Having gone through the struggle that he may be walking through, it only made sense I would be there to encourage him, in the dream. Much of his journey I learned from his preaching. So, in this dream, it seemed he was facing another decision point to stay or “move forward” again in God.

    

     Before my departure from WOFF, the long deliverance sessions of loud prayer were not as frequent as in years past. So, besides the long list of “don’ts”- what is the message of WOFF? In wedding programs, they publish “What We Believe”. In that program they give their beliefs with supporting scripture references. Without pretending to remember them all, I will give a partial list. WOFF believes in Jesus as the Son of God and the Way to Salvation, the Trinity, The Gifts of the Spirit, Laying on of Hands, Raising of Hands, Singing Praises from Scripture, Holy Communion, Intercessory Prayer, Baptism for Believers.. I am not sure if this next one is listed, but it are practiced- Foot-washing. Again, I don’t pretend that this list is complete. But, it gives a general idea where WOFF stands doctrinally.

   

     As with any church that may or may not have similar doctrinal beliefs, the most vital assessment of a group lies in what they practice as a result of their beliefs and interpretation of Scripture. Another church may have similar doctrinal positions, but they could celebrate Christmas and Easter as well as allow their members freedom to make decisions on their own. So, in looking at what sets WOFF apart from other churches, it is obvious there are many more rules (don’ts) with WOFF than other churches with similar doctrines. ( I know, I have been in several before WOFF.) The “Freedom in Christ” mentioned in scriptures for the New Testament believer does not exist at WOFF. In light of this, why defend or continue this set of heavily enforced rules and don’ts? This method of controlling others is doomed for failure. When you cut off by hell-threatening edicts a member’s personal choices and attempt to program their total environment; that attempt stifles a basic human component- the need for Freedom of Choice! We, as humans -ESPECIALLY in this country- are guaranteed choices! Remember? Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness! 

    

    Many long time WOFF members have found a defensible comfort zone in their mind and heart that allows them to rationalize why they stay at WOFF. (I know, because I had that rationalization in my heart- until the control became too great to ignore.) This place of rationalization and numbness allows many to stay in a place where personal choices are denigrated and replaced through Jane’s “authority” and constant peer pressures. This is done with adherence to yet MORE rules. False fences built by these rules in many ways offer a sense of “security”. “If I just follow the rules, I will fulfill the “Call of God” and Jane will be pleased.” By choosing the message and practices of the leader of WOFF, one is precluded from exercising their GOD given life choices! But, it should not. Why would choosing the religion of WOFF automatically require giving up basic choices in a person’s life? Why does membership at WOFF and choosing Jane Whaley –  require a person to relinquish Freedom in Christ as taught in Scriptures? Is the purpose for the surrender of choices aimed at the member’s salvation or meeting Jane’s expectations and requirements? In reality, what are the choices for members of  WOFF? They seem limited- such as- Yes, Jane or Yes, Jane- Or maybe- Yes, Jane. We should ask Sam!

   

     People have asked me- “How can such intelligent, well-meaning folks make the choice to live at WOFF?”  I can’t answer for all, but this much I know- when you chose to live at WOFF- you don’t see it as giving up something (though you definitely are..) Because of the way a new member is treated and “loved”, they are taught to see it as gaining the assurance from Jane Whaley that if you do what God tells her- then you will live holy and make it to heaven. This is what Jane would say- alot.     “Jesus Christ came to deliver you and save you from sin and teach you how to walk righteously in Him…”  The way this worked at WOFF was that Jane determined “sin” and she heard God “how to walk righteously”.