The Parable of the Good Samaritan
30Jesus, [f]taking him up, replied, A certain man was going from Jerusalem down to Jericho, and he fell among robbers, who stripped him of his clothes and belongings and beat him and went their way, [[g]unconcernedly] leaving him half dead, as it happened. 31Now by [h]coincidence a certain priest was going down along that road, and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. 32A Levite likewise came down to the place and saw him, and passed by on the other side [of the road]. 33But a certain Samaritan, as he traveled along, came down to where he was; and when he saw him, he was moved with pity and sympathy [for him], 34And went to him and dressed his wounds, pouring on [them] oil and wine. Then he set him on his own beast and brought him to an inn and took care of him. 35And the next day he took out two denarii [two day’s wages] and gave [them] to the innkeeper, saying, Take care of him; and whatever more you spend, I [myself] will repay you when I return. 36Which of these three do you think proved himself a neighbor to him who fell among the robbers? 37He answered, The one who showed pity and mercy to him. And Jesus said to him, Go and do likewise. (Luke 10:29-37, Amplified Version, emphasis added)
Recently, a review of the parable of the Good Samaritan revealed new insight for me. I read about the priest and the Levite who shunned and ignored the man in need, AFTER SEEING him. Unlike possible circumstances today, it was not as if there were already medics at the scene, caring for the man who was beaten. The inference is that the man, who had been beaten, was in a very helpless desperate state. The priest and the Levite represented the religious order of the day. What kept them from taking time to help? For sure, in this example, their religious position did not lend itself to stoop down and help one in need.
After reading the parable, I was reminded of things I had done while a member of Word of Faith Fellowship (WOFF). When a member was put “in discipleship”, other members were expected to withhold fellowship and restrict speaking to that member. You may have been able to say “hello”, at times, but no “foolish or loose talk”. I can remember a few times, I went and asked a person in leadership, if I could talk to the person in discipleship. The reason given to not speak or fellowship was so you would not “pull them out of the dealings of God”. For new folks or members who were unaware, it was the first steps to teaching the “grace to shun and ignore”. If you wanted to continue as a part of WOFF, you learned this “grace” or things did not go well. This “grace” was the “law” at WOFF.